The following alphabetical list shows the number of times additional features were used by each campus in determining its 2010 accountability rating. A List of Additional Features Used by Districts is also available. See Chapter 3 of the 2010 Accountability Manual for a complete explanation of Additional Features and how they are used in determining ratings. Note that only campuses rated under standard procedures are shown.

Please note that if the Required Improvement and/or TPM features were used to achieve the 2010 rating, it cannot be assumed that the next lower rating would have been assigned if those features had not been applied. Since the Exceptions Provision allows districts and campuses to achieve a higher rating if specific criteria are met, it is possible that the rating assigned based on the use of RI and/or TPM would not differ from the rating assigned without the use of those two features.

Campuses and districts can be evaluated on as many as 35 measures (up to 25 for TAKS, up to 5 for Annual Dropout Rate, and up to 5 for Completion Rate I). Whether or not a measure is evaluated depends on whether minimum size criteria are met. See Chapter 2 in the 2010 Accountability Manual.

This List is also available as a PDF Download or Excel Download.

To locate a campus, click on the first letter of the district name and scroll down. Campuses are listed alphabetically below the district name.