Appendix B.
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
1994-95 Analyze Category Descriptions


ENROLLMENT GROUPINGS
A nine-category grouping based on the total number of students enrolled by district as of the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) fall collection date (late October of each year). Enrollment excludes students who are served but not enrolled by districts.

DISTRICT TYPE
Classification of school districts based on factors such as size, growth rates, and proximity to urban areas as follows:

Major Urban. The state's eight largest metropolitan districts serving the Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Fort Worth, Austin, Corpus Christi, and El Paso areas.

Major Suburban. Other districts in and around the major urban areas.

Other Central City. Major districts in other large Texas cities.

Other Central City Suburban. Other districts in and around the other large, but not major, Texas cities.

Independent Town. Largest districts in counties with populations of 25,000 to 100,000.

Non-Metro: Fast Growing. Districts not fitting in any of above categories but exhibiting a five year growth rate of at least 20 percent with at least 300 students enrolled.

Non-Metro: Stable. Districts not fitting any of above categories but with an enrollment exceeding the state median.

Rural. Districts not fitting any of above categories; districts either with an enrollment between 300 and the state median and a growth rate less than 20 percent, or with an enrollment less than 300.

PROPERTY WEALTH
Total taxable property value divided by enrollment, which indicates district ability to raise local funds on a per pupil basis. The property value used is total taxable value for the last completed calendar year-i.e., 1994, as determined by the Comptroller's Property Tax Division (CPTD), whereas enrollment is for the 1994-95 school year. The first wealth grouping shows ten categories; the second simply shows districts above and below state average wealth; the third is a 20-category grouping with each category representing about five percent of the state's students. The six special statutory districts without taxable property wealth form a separate group in all three wealth groupings.

TOTAL TAX EFFORT
A four-category tax effort grouping of districts defined by the total effective tax rate, which was determined by dividing the last completed calendar year's total levy amount by that year's CPTD total taxable property value. The total effective rate is the sum of the school district maintenance and operations (M&O) rate, and the interest and sinking fund standardized rate. Rates are expressed per $100 of taxable value. The six special statutory districts without property tax levies appear separately.

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS EFFECTIVE TAX RATES
A four-category tax effort grouping of districts showing the maintenance and operation (M&O) effective tax rate, which was determined by dividing the last completed calendar year's M&O levy amount by that year's CPTD total taxable property value. The M&O rate shown include the local standardized rate. The six special statutory districts without property tax levies appear separately.

HIGHEST PROPERTY VALUE CATEGORY
A 13-category CPTD classification based on property use. These 13 are aggregated into four categories as follows:

Residential. Single-family, multi-family, and residential inventory.

Land. Vacant lots and rural real (taxable).

Oil and Gas. Oil, gas, and minerals.

Business. Commercial and industrial real, commercial and industrial personal, and utilities.

A district is placed into one of the four categories above that represents its greatest total property value. The six special statutory districts without taxable property wealth form a separate group.

SMALL/SPARSE ADJUSTMENT
A four-category grouping of districts based on the small/sparse adjustment amount as a percent of the total adjusted basic allotment amount. A fifth category contains all districts receiving no small/sparse adjustment. This percentage represents the extent to which state funding is adjusted to compensate for small and/or sparsely populated districts.

COST OF EDUCATION INDEX LEVEL
A five-category grouping of districts based on the Cost of Education Index (CEI) level. It reflects geographic variations in costs and prices outside district control.

OPERATING COST PER STUDENT
A five-category grouping of districts based on operating cost per student. Operating costs are the sum of all expenditures budgeted for the operation of the district for all funds. The operating expenditures are a subset of the total expenditures; they do not include debt service, capital outlay, or ancillary services expenditures. Per student amounts are the school year expenditures divided by enrollment. The source for budgeted expenditures is the fall PEIMS submission.

EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION
The state is divided into 20 geographic regions; districts within each region are served by an Education Service Center.

TAAS: PERCENT PASSING ALL TESTS TAKEN
A five-category grouping of districts based on the percent passing the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS). For Grades 3-8 and 11, the total number of students passing all sections taken of the TAAS is expressed as a percentage of the total number of students taking one or more tests. This percentage excludes special education students and third graders taking the test in Spanish.

SAT/ACT: PERCENT TAKING
A three-category grouping based on the percent of graduates taking the 1993/94 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and/or American College Testing Program's ACT Assessment. A fourth category is reserved for districts in which no SAT or ACT was administered.

SAT/ACT: PERCENT SCORING ABOVE CRITERION
A five-category grouping based on the percent of students who scored at or above the criterion (1000 on the SAT total, 24 on the ACT composite) for the 1993/94 SAT and/or ACT. A sixth category is reserved for districts in which no SAT or ACT was administered.

STUDENT DENSITY
A four-category grouping based on density, or the number of students enrolled per square mile. District square miles were determined through a joint effort by the State Property Tax Board (SPTB), the Texas Education Agency, and the Texas Water Commission. Maps provided by districts to the SPTB were digitized by the Water Commission to determine acreage. The six special statutory districts without available mileage information form a separate group.

ENROLLMENT CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR
A five-category grouping based on the growth or decline in district student population over a one year period. Districts with declining enrollment represent one category, while remaining categories show one-year growth rates ranging from "0%-3%" to "10% and over."

PERCENT AFRICAN AMERICAN, HISPANIC, AND
MINORITY STUDENTS

Three six-category sets of groupings according to the ethnic composition of district student populations, as reported on PEIMS. Minority percent is calculated as the sum of all non-white populations expressed as a percentage of the total. Non-white populations include Native American or Alaskan Native; Asian or Pacific Islander; African American, not of Hispanic origin; and Hispanic.

PERCENT LOW INCOME STUDENTS
A six-category grouping according to the district percentage of enrolled students classified as economically disadvantaged on PEIMS as follows:

a) Eligible for free or reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch and Child
Nutrition Program;
b) From a family with annual income at/below the federal poverty line;
c) Eligible for AFDC or other public assistance;
d) Recipient of Pell Grant or comparable state need-based financial assistance program; or
e) Eligible for programs assisted under Title II of the Job Training Partnership Act.

AVERAGE TEACHER EXPERIENCE
A four-category grouping of average teacher experience years computed as total professional experience years for all district teachers divided by total teacher full-time-equivalent (FTE) count.

AVERAGE TEACHER SALARY
A four-category grouping by average district teacher salary computed as the total salary of teachers divided by the total teacher FTE count. Total salary amount does not include career ladder or any other supplement.

PERCENT OF TEACHERS WITH ADVANCED DEGREES
A four-category grouping by district percentage of teachers with advanced degrees computed as the FTE count of teachers with a master's or doctoral degree divided by the total teacher FTE count.

PERCENT MINORITY TEACHERS
A six-category grouping according to the minority composition of district teaching populations. Minority percent is calculated by summing all non-white teacher FTEs and dividing by the total teacher FTEs.



Return to Dropout Report's Table of Contents