EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS
2000 Campuses with Less Than 50% of the Students Passing Any Reading, Writing, or Mathematics Test on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) Summed Across the Grades Tested at the School in Any Two of the Three Years: 1998, 1999, 2000 or the School was Rated Low-Performing in either 1998, 1999 or 2000
|
DISTRICT NAME |
The district name. |
|
CAMPUS NAME |
The most current name of the campus in TEA files. |
|
CAMPUS NUMBER |
The nine-digit number used by TEA to uniquely identify each campus in the state. |
|
2000 ACCT RATING |
The campus rating issued for the school in the summer of 2000. The ratings used are: E Exemplary A Acceptable L Low-performing R Recognized |
|
Identification Years: |
|
|
*YR_1998 |
The reason, if any, that the campus was identified for this list based on 1997-98 TAAS results or 1998 accountability ratings. The reason codes are explained below. |
|
*YR_1999 |
The reason, if any, that the campus was identified for this list based on 1998-99 TAAS results or 1999 accountability ratings. The reason codes are explained below. |
|
*YR_2000 |
The reason, if any, that the campus was identified for this list based on 1999-2000 TAAS results or 2000 accountability ratings. The reason codes are explained below. |
|
Reasons for Identification: |
|
|
R |
The TAAS passing rate in Reading was below 50 percent for the tested grades at the campus. |
|
W |
The TAAS passing rate in Writing was below 50 percent for the tested grades at the campus. |
|
M |
The TAAS passing rate in Mathematics was below 50 percent for the tested grades at the campus. |
|
LP |
The campus was rated Low-performing. |
* Ratings are issued in August of a given year and are in effect for the following school year. For example, the 2000 ratings are based on TAAS results given in the spring of the 1999-00 school year, and dropout and attendance rates from the 1998-99 school year. The 2000 ratings remain in effect throughout the 2000-01 school year.