July 24, 2006
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESSED:
Subject: 2006-2007 Preliminary Summary of Finances (HB1
was passed during the third called session of the 79th Texas Legislature)
A preliminary Summary of Finances (SOF) and other related reports
for the 2006-2007 school year have been posted to the TEA school
finance web site, and includes important information noted below:
• 2005 CPTD Value - In accordance with Section
42.253(b) of the Texas Education Code (Rider 3 of the 2005 General
Appropriation Act), the Comptroller’s Property Tax Division (CPTD)
value being used in the LPE column of this SOF is the greater
of (1) the district’s 2004 CPTD value (the “T2” value used in
2005-06 school year) increased by 5.03 percent, or (2) the district’s
final 2005 CPTD (“T2” value) recently certified by the Comptroller’s
office. In the DPE column, the CPTD value being used is the district’s
final 2005 CPTD value (“T2” value).
• Student Counts - All student counts (ADA,
FTEs, and enrollment counts) shown in the LPE and DPE columns
for the Foundation School Program estimates are based on the March
2005 student projections that were submitted and approved during
the Legislative appropriation process. Please note that
payments distributed to districts during the year are based on
the estimated student counts shown in the LPE column.
Student counts in the DPE column will be adjusted by the Agency
when the 2007 Fall PEIMS enrollment data are available in March
2007 and again in August 2007 when actual student counts become
available. The August 2007 student counts in the DPE column will
be used to recalculate funding for year-end settle-up.
School district budgets should be based on the student enrollment
and program participation that is expected to actually occur during
the year. Districts and open-enrollment charter schools should
carefully monitor their state aid payments during the year, which
may differ from actual operations at year end, creating an overpayment
or underpayment condition that must be recorded properly in the
accounting records of the districts and charter schools.
• Tax Collections
a)
For the first level of Tier II with GL at $31.95 – The M&O
tax collection amount used for Tier II purposes on both the LPE
and DPE column was calculated by increasing the 2005 CPTD value
shown by 5.00 percent and multiplying that increased value by
the district’s 2006-07 compressed rate (2005-06 M&O tax rate
derived from the Comptroller’s Self-Report multiplied by 88.67
percent).
b) For the second level of Tier II with GL at $41.21 – For
this preliminary SOF, it is assumed that the district will adopt
an M&O tax rate that is $0.04 above its compressed rate. When
the actual M&O rate is adopted and reported to the Agency,
a revised SOF will be generated. The M&O tax collections
for the $0.04 on both the LPE and DPE columns were calculated
by multiplying the same increased value calculated for the first
level by .0004.
These tax collections will be updated when the 2006 local property
value (including the frozen levy and tax increment financing amounts)
and the 2005-06 and 2006-07 adopted M&O tax rates are reported
by districts later this summer.
• Additional State Aid for Tax Reduction and State Aid
Reduction for Excess Revenue (are included in the Foundation School
Program funds, for payment purposes) - The Additional
State Aid for Tax Reduction and State Aid Reduction for Excess
Revenue are calculated based on the scenario that produces the
greatest amount of revenue per student in weighted average daily
attendance (WADA). The scenarios are calculated as follows:
o Scenario
1 (S1) - the district’s 2005-06 total state and local
revenue per WADA in accordance with Section 42.2516 (b)(1)(A)
of HB 1, which is based on the law prior to the passage of HB
1.
o Scenario 2 (S2) - the district’s 2006-07 total
state and local revenue in accordance with Section 42.2516 (b)(1)(B)
of HB 1, which is based on the law prior to the passage of HB
1.
o Scenario 3 (S3) - the district’s 2005-06 total
state and local revenue in accordance with Section 42.2516 (b)(1)(C)
of HB 1, which is based on the law prior to the passage of HB
1 except that it uses the tax rates as prescribed by HB 1.
o Scenario 4 (S4) – the district’s 2006-07 total
state and local revenue based on HB 1.
Please see the 2006-07 Hold Harmless Determination
report that is a part of the 2006-07 SOF report for details on
these calculations. The maximum (MAX) of S1, S2, or S3 is compared
to S4. This amount does not include the salary allotment under
Section 42.2516(b)(2) or the high school allotment under Section
42.2516(b)(3) of HB 1. These allotments are treated separately
on the SOF.
Additional State Aid for Tax Reduction (ASATR) – If
the S4 revenue is less than the maximum (MAX) of S1 or S2 or
S3, the difference is the Additional State Aid for Tax Reduction
(ASATR). See Line 12 on S4.
State Aid Reduction for Excess Revenue (SARER) – If
the S4 revenue exceeds the maximum (MAX) of S1 or S2 or S3,
the district is subject to the State Aid Reduction for Excess
Revenue (SARER). The “excess” revenue will be subtracted from
the district’s total state funds (Line 13 on S4).
• “Hold Harmless” – Additional State Aid (under
old law) – If the district qualifies for “hold harmless” additional
state aid, the amount is shown on page 4 of the SOF under the
Additional Aid category. If the district’s loss in local revenue
resulting from the additional $10,000 homestead exemption is not
entirely offset from additional state aid, the difference is made
up with additional “hold harmless” state aid (this report is located
below the SOF report posted to the web).
• Salary Transition Entitlement – If the district
qualifies for salary transition, the amount is shown on page 4
of the SOF under the “Additional Aid” category. If the district’s
cost of the $3,000 raise authorized in 1999 is not entirely offset
with 80 percent of the additional state aid resulting from the
funding element increases made in 1999, the difference is made
up with salary transition (this report is included with the SOF
report posted to the web). The number of FTEs for teachers and
full-time librarians, nurses, and counselors used in this calculation
will be updated when these data become available for 2006-07.
• Existing Debt Allotment (EDA) and Instructional Facilities
Allotment (IFA) – If the district qualifies for EDA or
IFA, the preliminary earned allotments appear on the first page
of the SOF under the “Additional Aid” heading. The IFA allotment
has not yet been adjusted for 2005-06 settle up purposes. The
agency is in the process of updating the information on EDA eligible
debt from the State Information Depository, and the amount
of the EDA allocation may change as a result of that update later
this summer. Payment reports and instructions for updating debt
information can be found on the IFA website http://www.tea.state.tx.us/school.finance/facilities/ifa.html
and the EDA website http://www.tea.state.tx.us/school.finance/facilities/eda.html.
• Transportation Allocation – The allocation
is based on the district’s 2004-05 transportation allotment as
calculated from data submitted on the 2004-05 Route Services Report.
This allotment will be updated when the allotments for 2005-06
are determined.
• Projected Settle-up - The preliminary projected
2005-06 settle-up amount is indicated on page 5 of the SOF in
the DPE column. This amount is an estimate only, and will be adjusted
when PEIMS data for the year-ending 2005-06 is updated. If the
district is currently projected to be overpaid for the 2005-06
school year, that projected overpayment (signified by a “credit”
balance) is shown as the Adjustments-to-Date amount. If the district
is currently projected to be underpaid for the 2005-06 school
year, the Adjustments-to-Date amount will be zero, since the underpayment
will be paid in a lump sum in September 2006. Please keep in mind
that the projected settle-up will change as new data become available.
For a district that has a credit balance because of WADA
sold, this settle-up amount is not shown in the SOFs. For 2005-06,
this refund is due on or before August 16, 2006.
• Other – This SOF does not include the New
Instructional Facilities Allotment (NIFA) funds. The SOF will
be updated when these allocations are determined. The 2006-07
Hold Harmless for State Aid Gains related to the public school
employee health insurance requirements is used from 2005-06 allocation.
• Additional
Aid from HB 1 (78th Legislature, 2003) – In accordance
with the Rider 82(c) of the General Appropriations Act, the additional
aid from HB 1 ($110 per WADA) for “budget balanced” districts
is reduced by the gain in the increase in the Available School Fund.
For the Hold Harmless Chapter 41 districts, the
additional aid from HB 1 is reduced by the net gain from the Available
School Fund and the increase in the recapture.
For those districts that do not receive Tier I state aid from the
Foundation School Fund, a report entitled Worksheet for Determining
the Reduction in Additional Aid from HB 1 is also included
with the district’s SOF posted to the web. This report shows how
the “reduction” amount, if any, was derived.
• Per Capita Rate – A rate of $317 multiplied
by the prior-year ADA is used to estimate the per capita allotment.
This rate is subject to change.
• Technology Allotment – The technology allotment
is based on a rate of $30 multiplied by the district’s 2005-06
Refined ADA, and accounted for in the Special Revenue Fund 411.
This rate is subject to change.